Grand Jury Said to Decline to Re-Indict Letitia James

Grand Jury Said to Decline to Re-Indict Letitia James, and the center is capable of deciding for the court. Carol Leving, what are the developments? There are. We have two sources that confirm that the grand jury did not agree to indict Letitia James today.

That does not mean that the Department of Justice will not try to do it again. We have asked the Department of Justice, and they have commented on the grand jury's decision.

And have not discussed it, have not discussed the details, but have said that there should be no question about it. But our understanding from two sources is that the grand jury did not agree today to indict Letitia James on the mortgage fraud charge.

So that's not called trouble. Right, and it doesn't happen often. But it's happening a lot. It happened in Washington, D.C., with a lot of the cases that they tried. Is this the first time, Carol, that we know of that happening in Norfolk?

You know, I don't know the uninitiated as well as I do the D.C. and the Southern District of New York. So I can't say for sure, but your gist is that it doesn't happen often on the money. I remember

When we were reporting on the injustice that was happening in OURBOOK, that Andrew McCabe was trying to sue the government in the first Trump administration.

And the prosecutors were shocked that there was no bill in this case, because they couldn't remember a time that this had happened before. That's very rare. And for Andrew Point, it's not rare.

It's embarrassing for the Justice Department because they don't just bring cases against them to a grand jury. The standard is an easy bar to jump. I mean,

Andrew, let me try to put this in a non-legal context for people, remember, actually. How different is this from the second to the first Trump term?

In which I gave the source, oh, go. Next, break in. I have a go, I apologize. Go, go. If you know more, shake your arm and come back.

I remember talking on the phone with a senior Justice Department official after that grand jury in DC refused to indict, gave no trials, or refused to indict Jim Comey.

And it was an earthquake. It was resurgent around the Justice Department. It's a marker of the shamelessness or hostage-taking that this dodgy leadership has toward Donald Trump's political operation, that it seems.

That they don't care that he's in a straitjacket. Cases are being dismissed by grand jurors. I mean, what is this? How does this reflect on Pam Bondi and Todd Blanchett today?

Well, you know, going back to what I said, you know, if this reporting is accurate and true, it would be interesting for the courts to decide the claims of criminal and selective prosecution.

The likely reason for indictments these days is, that is, the search for vindictive and selective prosecutions. As Carolmencing has been done and you mentioned, that doesn't happen.

I was a prosecutor for 21 years. I've never seen one in a district that I didn't grow up in. The only time I've ever heard of a grand jury saying no to a proposed indictment was when there was almost collusion, where the prosecutor would sometimes, in police cases, the entire area jurors would vote not to charge the police officer, and there was a strong smell of that.

The prosecutor was kind of wanted. And so they weren't practically rejecting the prosecutor's wishes. They were taking it to say, yes, we brought it up,

But they didn't. So it's not our fault. That's the only time I've ever actually heard anything like that, because it shows vindictive and selective prosecution,

and it shows that they're not being rude. Even you know, they can't deal with each other.

And it's really the kind of thing that you can't just say, oh, I blame the judges, and I blame the judges. Every time you lose,

At some point, you're going to have to look, you're going to have to look. That's me. When you remember, this is the same department that literally couldn't indict Hamsandwich.

In the case of someone throwing a sandwich at an agent in DC, the grand jury refused to indict him, so he was supposed to be brought to trial on a lesser charge.

Where you didn't do it. So to me, that's a black mark on the Department of Justice, and to stick to it. And it's something that happens at the same time.

When they go to court, where they get rejected because they meet judges who are supposedly outlawed, they're looking at judges.

And not the so-called Biden judges, not the Obama judges. You're looking at judges from all over the country who are appointed by bi-Republicans and Democrats, bi-Republicans and Democrats, DPP and

What's going on here is to reject his first term and find that the government's representations cannot be trusted. And that's the kind of behavior that leads to that conclusion.

But I also think we have a system that is conducive to self-reflection about what's going on. Well, self-reflection, yes,

But what about all the losers? I mean, these are the same people. People like to describe TODD BLANCHE as someone who is down to earth.

Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted child sex trafficker who raped underage girls and had sex with Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, Christie, of all people,

says that this is extremely unusual for a deputy attorney general. She has now filed a motion for a change and pardon. Under Todd Blanche’s leadership.

The department is taking back the Keystone police. Not to disparage the Keystone police, but they have an illegally appointed U.S. Attorney.

Who has failed to acknowledge this for the most part, and not to separate the different stories. I mean, TheFabi has now got a rant.

That has made the public squirm about launching a counterterrorism investigation into six lawmakers, most of them veterans, for carrying out any illegal orders against combatants.

It was days before the Washington Post found out about the double-tap strike that had destroyed the ship in the Caribbean. I mean, what is the United States Department of Justice?

Right now? But remember that after this interview that the deputy attorney general himself did, Glenn Maxwell was transferred to a camp-to-low-level prison facility, reporting that,

along with playing with a dog that is brought in to please him. And this is someone who the judge said was involved in the sexual assault of women and minors.

And was complicit in it. And this is the judge's action and sentence, a 20-year sentence. You also have the Deputy Attorney General declaring in a speech to the Federalist Society.

There is a war on judges. And it should be noted that this will include judges like Judge Wilkerson on the Fourth Circuit, a leading conservative who has taken the government to task for the terms they were making.

Garcia is saying that this is a path to lawlessness. This includes judges like Kernmergot on the West Coast, who said that the government’s responsibility was to use the military in a domestic setting,

and to the contrary. These are his words. These are so-called judges who are proven by the Deputy Attorney General because of the likes of Stephen Milnerd.

And they have their own judges. You have to think, if you use them, what happens? Tom, this is a Justice Department that just moved out of the White House.

And it’s a non-political arm. A final example of this is when PAM BONDIAN announced on FOX NEWS, believe me, it was he that Mr. ABREGOGARCIA is a terrorist and a thug.

That tells you everything you need to know about this Justice Department. Even if it were true, it has nothing to do with

Whether he was entitled to due process in the Justice Department or not, and should have complied with the court order that said he could not be deported. And so Pam Bondian knows.

That she is Jesus' lawyer. She knows full well what she was saying, and it was a non-political statement to try to get people to not care because she was being vilified. But this is the Attorney General of the United Nations. The only one I was